Page 8 of 8 First ... 5678
Results 176 to 194 of 194

  1. Post
    Yeah i didn't think i'd like it but its not bad, apart from the silly customization of the uniforms.

  2. Post
    I like the way the movement feels my graphics look pretty sheet even on a 980ti on ultra

  3. Post
    Yeah the graphics look piss poor.

  4. Post
    LinkJKL wrote:
    Well its a bit of a flop, can't join any servers without immediate disconnection.
    Just a note, after getting fluffed off spending 45 minutes bouncing off matches as soon as I finished loading. Repaired BF5 in Origin and it seemed to have resolved it (although I was only playing for an hour or so last night and didn't change servers once I got into one).

  5. Post
    I will definitely be waiting for a bit after release to see if this is worth getting. Not liking the SJW rubbish already let alone the above posts. The reality is what you guys are playing with now is 90% atleast of the main release.

  6. Post
    SheepShagger556 wrote:
    Not liking the SJW rubbish.
    I don't think it's SJW at all, it's just a different take on WW2.

  7. Post
    jdz wrote:
    I don't think it's SJW at all, it's just a different take on WW2.
    http://9gag.com/gag/aq7q2N7

  8. Post
    Penis is also censored vagina is not

    Bfv confirmed to be developed by the left socialist and communist matriarchy organisation set on taking over

  9. Post
    SirGrim wrote:
    Penis is also censored vagina is not
    Confirmed EA are a bunch of feminazi's. I'm 100% not playing anymore.

  10. Post
    My Thoughts.

    Didnt buy in to Hardline/BF1 but BF5 reinvigorated my interest.
    Performance was great at 1440p High on a 1080. 90 FPS reliably.

    Maps were OK, But I felt they were both too Infantry focused. I would need to see some larger ones. I never got a tank to play in during 2 days of play.....Where is the rest of the "Battlefield" ?

    Movement felt good, weapon handling was rewarding (once i found the upgrade system).
    Classes were all OK except medic which felt kinda superfluous. Assault easily felt the most powerful to me.
    Lack of ammo was terrible at first, but took a change of mindset to get used to.

  11. Post
    I agree, these so called conquest maps were very small, not enough vehicles and space for vehicles - very focus on forcing infantry into small chokepoints - and dunno if its just my me but every year as graphics get better, it becomes harder to spot enemies in multiplayer games as their textures camouflage more into the environments and with the spotting system reworked it becomes even harder for me to spot enemies

    maybe I'll just stick to playing cs:go and overwatch, I'm not sure if I like this new battlefield - the maps are no where near the quality of the maps DICE produced pre BF3 - after BF3 their quality really started going downhill

  12. Post
    Flannel wrote:
    Classes were all OK except medic which felt kinda superfluous. Assault easily felt the most powerful to me.
    I really think this is how it should be too. In BF2 a medic was effectively a super-powered assault player, leaving not much need for the assault class.

  13. Post
    SirGrim wrote:
    dunno if its just my me but every year as graphics get better, it becomes harder to spot enemies in multiplayer games as their textures camouflage more into the environments and with the spotting system reworked it becomes even harder for me to spot enemies
    I would agree. Camouflage is certainly getting more effective as textures improve. Brits needed better uniforms on the snow map IMO, it felt like a real disadvantage.

    Lack of vehicle play was startling.
    It's WW2 I get it, so air fighting is going to be limited. No choppers, few planes. But to me it felt like a completely separate battle in the sky that could be ignored from the ground. Having no runways and such a small map boundary just made that feel even less interesting

    I can also count on one hand the amount of times that Enemy Armor gave me any trouble when capturing a flag point. This is not battlefield. I hope that there is a lot more behind the curtain, but I suspect this will be another release that I will skip.

    Don't get me started on building sandbags and barbed wire in the middle of a conflict.....

  14. Post
    SirGrim wrote:
    Penis is also censored vagina is not

    Bfv confirmed to be developed by the left socialist and communist matriarchy organisation set on taking over
    Lol if it was anyone else posting this I'd think it was a piss take.

  15. Post
    I uninstalled the beta, the un-authenticity kills it for me.

  16. Post
    Just played an hour of Bad Company 2.
    Reconfirms my thoughts of BF5:TrashTier

  17. Post
    I really enjoyed the beta had the time of my life talking crap and sniping people will definitely be getting

  18. Post
    SirGrim wrote:
    Penis is also censored vagina is not

    Bfv confirmed to be developed by the left socialist and communist matriarchy organisation set on taking over
    diddle was okay but diddles was censored, how do you feel about dices hate for multiple diddle?

  19. Post
    Looks like there will be planes taking off now.
    https://twitter.com/MrProWestie/stat...736103937?s=19