Results 1 to 23 of 23

  1. Post

    Posts in this thread appear as comments on the following Gameplanet article:

    Read article...

  2. Post
    #2
    Was curious. Looked at a vid. Laughed and then puked (have food poisoning).

  3. Post
    #3
    silly by Blizzard, this jsut means that now we are gonna get a Not-Overwatch Porn XXX Parody.

  4. Post
    #4
    There goes my midnight entertainment

  5. Post
    #5
    Thats the shame. The porn is the only thing that made this game even close to interesting

  6. Post
    #6
    I predict this will just increase the amount of overwatch porn being made and more people aware it exists

  7. Post
    #7
    Something only a company that hasn't heard of the streisand effect would do

  8. Post
    #8
    Advertising for the 12 year olds and 40 year old virgins to get excited about the game...

  9. Post
    #9
    Clavulanate wrote:
    I predict this will just increase the amount of overwatch porn being made and more people aware it exists
    Yeap, had no idea about this, and, well, curiosity got the better of me... All I'l say is that there's people with some decent animation skills going well to waste!

  10. Post
    #10
    Gamester wrote:
    Advertising for the 12 year olds and 40 year old virgins to get excited about the game...
    The same ones that think tracer's ass is even a 3/10 just because she's in skintight clothing. Flat ass and looks like a boy.

  11. Post
    #11
    Viilai wrote:
    The same ones that think tracer's ass is even a 3/10 just because she's in skintight clothing. Flat ass and looks like a boy.
    well, with western porn there is always a homoerotic undertone to it

  12. Post
    #12
    Bloody wrote:
    well, with western porn there is always a homoerotic undertone to it
    Even Genji has a nicer ass so clearly I'm not discriminating based on gender :P

    My list goes Widowmaker -> D.Va -> Genji -> Mercy -> Everyone else -> Tracer

  13. Post
    #13
    Bastion is my go to meowwww

  14. Post
    #14
    My list goes WTF!

    I don't get it, you have easy access to virtually unlimited porn involving real people these days, and yet some people would rather get off to digital characters...

  15. Post
    #15
    I don't think they're really cracking down on porn specifically, it's more cracking down on the use of their assets without permission.

  16. Post
    #16
    Soan wrote:
    I don't think they're really cracking down on porn specifically, it's more cracking down on the use of their assets without permission.
    I think its actually the other way round. They're cracking down on porn by using the assets permission as the reason even though they themselves made the tool everyone is using (Source Filmmaker).

  17. Post
    #17
    ChrisB wrote:
    I think its actually the other way round. They're cracking down on porn by using the assets permission as the reason even though they themselves made them available for use in Source's Filmaker.
    Did Blizzard make them officially available for use in Filmmaker though? The article makes it sound like the models were ripped from Overwatch without permission.

  18. Post
    #18
    Soan wrote:
    Did Blizzard make them officially available for use in Filmmaker though? The article makes it sound like the models were ripped from Overwatch without permission.
    I edited my post. However source filmmaker is designed to use in-game assets to make films so there is an inferred permission.

    From the Steam Page
    Valve wrote:
    The Source Filmmaker (SFM) is the movie-making tool built and used by us here at Valve to make movies inside the Source game engine. Because the SFM uses the same assets as the game, anything that exists in the game can be used in the movie, and vice versa.

  19. Post
    #19
    Now you're making it sound like Blizzard created Source Filmmaker, or that Valve created Overwatch, neither of which is true, and I'm pretty sure you know that. If either of those things were true then yeah, there'd be an inferred permission to use them.

    ChrisB wrote:
    I think its actually the other way round. They're cracking down on porn by using the assets permission as the reason even though they themselves made the tool everyone is using (Source Filmmaker).

  20. Post
    #20
    lol, yeah I have farted in the brain department in a massive way.

    Jesus, how the **** did I manage to merge Blizz and Valve?!

    Righto, move along nothing to see here.

  21. Post
    #21
    ChrisB wrote:
    lol, yeah I have farted in the brain department in a massive way.

    Jesus, how the **** did I manage to merge Blizz and Valve?!

    Righto, move along nothing to see here.
    You're not the only one. http://www.stuff.co.nz/80517555/ and in case they edit it: http://i.imgur.com/vBFLkcc.png

    Some dickhead with nothing but a shit ton of buzz words and no actual knowledge tried to write an article. It's pretty much unreadable because of how many freaking buzz words he uses.

    Also how the shit is Overwatch "Grim and Gritty"

  22. Post
    #22
    ok to wow porn...while heavily sexualizing the overwatch characters...are they trying make those porn by their own?

  23. Post
    #23
    Gamester wrote:
    Advertising for the 12 year olds and 40 year old virgins to get excited about the game...
    just like wow