A thread to discuss how ****ed up America is. (No Posts About The Wall)

Thread Rating: 7 votes, 4.43 average.
(7 votes)
Results 14,351 to 14,375 of 14613

  1. Post
    Lethargic wrote:
    [citation needed]

    Don't tell me the spam bots on Twitter are influencing our elections!!
    the power of memes

  2. Post
    CODChimera wrote:
    Because she is not a positive force for the democrats, they need to go towards bernie and aoc instead of idiots like Hillary and Biden
    Are they not? Hilary isn't running in 2020, she's an ex secretary of state of who probably understands Russian influence tactics better than 99.9% of people in the world.

    The secretary of state is a senior official of the federal government of the United States of America, and as head of the United States Department of State, is principally concerned with foreign policy and is considered to be the U.S. government's minister of foreign affairs.[3][4]
    she is the exact person who is qualified to comment on Russian interference, sorry if that triggers you.

  3. Post
    fellow russian assets, it's amazing to think how influential the kremlin-backed bots have been in this very subforum.

  4. Post
    Dans wrote:
    Are they not? Hilary isn't running in 2020, she's an ex secretary of state of who probably understands Russian influence tactics better than 99.9% of people in the world.
    One think she clearly never understood is political strategy, demonstrated by her leveling evidence-free smears against all of her old political rivals while simultaneously over-exposing and diluting the impact of her one and only defence for losing the 2016 election - "The Russians". The lazy partisan analysis that Russia is and was at the root of all issues and political dissent probably isnt going to play well with most americans when the allegations continue to be made by desperate Maddow viewers and Clintonites not only against opponents to the right of Clinton but also to the left.

  5. Post
    Maybe we can dig Mueller out of his coffin and get him to do another report on Tulsi this time? because that won't be a complete waste of time


  6. Post
    I love how in that article they repeat the line that "disinformation experts have also pointed to instances of suspicious activity surrounding Ms. Gabbard’s campaign" and then themselves continue to cite a disinformation article from NBC news which references discredited organisation "New Knowledge" as a source.

    https://theintercept.com/2019/02/03/...ocratic-party/

    Funny how they also claim that Tulsi is overrepresented on RT news, and use cable media outlets as a negative control. Anyone with 2 brain cells would know full well that anchors mentioning Tulsi on MSNBC at length would not have a job there very long. Look at Ed Shultz. The reason RT news is probably mentioning Tulsi at higher rates is because fired MSNBC anchors, e.g., Jesse Ventura, find a home there and have the freedom to talk about her lmao. Perhaps therefore it is the wrong conclusion to say that the mainstream media is fair and balanced in omitting Tulsi from the conversation, and in fact RT is covering her to counteract the failure of cable media.

    RT news is at least up front about their representation of the news from a russian perspective and have consistently said that they fill in the gaps left by the mainstream media.
    Last edited by clockblock; 23rd October 2019 at 6:27 am.

  7. Post
    Dans wrote:
    she is the exact person who is qualified to comment on Russian interference, sorry if that triggers you.
    For someone supposedly so qualified she let the russians walk all over her last election. She either was the worst Sec of State ever or she is the russian agent!

  8. Post
    An actual article on gabbard rather than the neo McCarthyism Nonsense https://theintercept.com/2019/01/05/...ionalist-modi/

  9. Post
    Clinton certainly did her a favour in terms of increased coverage.

  10. Post
    Vulcan wrote:
    For someone supposedly so qualified she let the russians walk all over her last election. She either was the worst Sec of State ever or she is the russian agent!
    lmao yeah

  11. Post
    Still wish Hillary would go away, but ****ing lmao forever https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/new...tulsi-gabbard/

  12. Post
    frio wrote:
    Still wish Hillary would go away, but ****ing lmao forever https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/new...tulsi-gabbard/
    Yeah, that was a shocker

  13. Post
    frio wrote:
    Still wish Hillary would go away, but ****ing lmao forever https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/new...tulsi-gabbard/

    She won't go away shes running its only a matter of time before she announces.

  14. Post
    Good to see the time away to quit drinking worked

  15. Post
    Thunderstorm wrote:
    She won't go away shes running its only a matter of time before she announces.
    Out of curiosity why do you think this thunderstorm?
    Maybe I have been looking in the wrong places but I can not find any evidence that she will.

  16. Post
    Vulcan wrote:
    For someone supposedly so qualified she let the russians walk all over her last election. She either was the worst Sec of State ever or she is the russian agent!
    Such a stupid point to make, what would you like her to do?

    She already called Trump a Russian puppet live on TV during the debate and Trump responded the way only someone guilty as hell (and obnoxiously stupid) would respond. Didn't change a thing.

    It's funny because you have people in this thread who are claiming the Mueller report is bunk, Russia didn't intefere, and then you have the same people calling Hilary incompetent because she didn't stop them. The mental gymnastics...

  17. Post
    Tbh if Bill English was bleating on and on in NZ politics I’d want him to **** off. Helen quietly pipes up now and again but it’s very contained. Hillary lost one of the ugliest election campaigns in recent history and for god knows what reason thinks it’s been long enough. It hasn’t. Tact is an important part of statesmanship and while she might just be doing the odd podcast or whatever, she should have the political sense to know that she’s a red flag to a bull — still.

    Totally agreed about the Mueller report though. We’ve rewritten that one as being a Clanger when the dems just didn’t follow up on it.

  18. Post
    Strange because I literally do not hear a thing about Hilary Clinton unless I specifically go and look for it or read cockhead/thundertard posting about it here.
    Oh the other exception would be Donald Trump's twitter or Fox News (basically the same thing), that's a pretty good thing to avoid if you don't want to read about 'crooked' Hilary.

  19. Post
    clockblock wrote:
    I love how in that article they repeat the line that "disinformation experts have also pointed to instances of suspicious activity surrounding Ms. Gabbard’s campaign" and then themselves continue to cite a disinformation article from NBC news which references discredited organisation "New Knowledge" as a source.

    https://theintercept.com/2019/02/03/...ocratic-party/

    Funny how they also claim that Tulsi is overrepresented on RT news, and use cable media outlets as a negative control. Anyone with 2 brain cells would know full well that anchors mentioning Tulsi on MSNBC at length would not have a job there very long. Look at Ed Shultz. The reason RT news is probably mentioning Tulsi at higher rates is because fired MSNBC anchors, e.g., Jesse Ventura, find a home there and have the freedom to talk about her lmao. Perhaps therefore it is the wrong conclusion to say that the mainstream media is fair and balanced in omitting Tulsi from the conversation, and in fact RT is covering her to counteract the failure of cable media.

    RT news is at least up front about their representation of the news from a russian perspective and have consistently said that they fill in the gaps left by the mainstream media.
    well yes

  20. Post
    well, even the NYT is no longer pretending to hide the bias

    https://youtu.be/tzTod38VS8c

    they stealth changed the references to the Russians to..Republicans..

  21. Post
    Bloody wrote:
    well, even the NYT is no longer pretending to hide the bias

    https://youtu.be/tzTod38VS8c

    they stealth changed the references to the Russians to..Republicans..
    They must have still been thinking about reds under the bed

    Found the archive link:
    https://archive.is/4K5cX
    Last edited by SL1CKSTA; 24th October 2019 at 9:36 am.

  22. Post
    de
    lusion
    al

  23. Post
    Good podcast worth checking out:

  24. Post
    SL1CKSTA irl